My Soundtrack Collection: The Abominable Dr. Phibes (1971)

The liner notes for this CD release of Basil Kirchin’s original score for The Abominable Dr. Phibes tells quite the convoluted tale.

Like so many other low-to-medium budget independent films, the rights for The Abominable Dr. Phibes changed ownership a great many times across the years/decades. Which is the primary reason given for why the original masters have gone missing and, in the case of John Gale’s original theme for Vulnavia, may never be found. [Never say never, though.]

When composer Basil Kirchin first met Vincent Price, he asked the actor how he intended to play the titular character. Comedic or straight? “Straight,” Price replied. Armed with this knowledge, Kirchin composed the film’s score to reflect that choice.

Kirchin’s serious approach disappointed director Robert Fuest, though. Fuest thought Kirchin’s music “too austere” and “understated” and that it did not reflect the character of Anton Phibes as he understood it. That is when composer John Gale was brought in and, in Kirchin’s opinion, “spoofed up” the film’s music style.

Although the original masters are lost, composer Basil Kirchin did retain possession of a few session recordings. Against Kirchin’s wishes (again!) this album presentation is broken into separate cues that are placed in film order. Kirchin wanted his score presented in two lengthy suites that contained both used and unused music for the film.

The pipe organ performance of Mendelssohn’s War March of the Priests that plays over the opening titles is taken from the film itself and starts the album in suitably grand fashion. Track 2 contains the memorable Dr. Phibes’ Waltz, which Phibes and Vulnavia dance to just after the opening titles end.

Not contained on the album is the bombastic trumpet variation of the Dr. Phibe’s Theme used in the film. So it goes.

Book Review: The Ghost Pirates and Others: The Best of William Hope Hodgson

The Ghost Pirates and Others

In early 1982 Rod Serling’s The Twilight Zone Magazine‘s April/May issue arrived in the mail. Nestled inside was a fascinating essay about one William Hope Hodgson, a writer I had never heard of, and a reprint of his 1907 short story The Voice in the Night. This is when I learned that the Japanese horror movie Matango (aka Attack of the Mushroom People) had been based, in part, upon that particular short story.

Many years later I would crack open an old paperback anthology titled Masters of Terror: Volume One: William Hope Hodgson, which introduced me to what might be my all time favorite William Hope Hodgson story, A Tropical Horror.

Glut! Glut!

Far too many years after that, I cracked open The Ghost Pirates and Others. I was delighted to find that both The Voice in the Night and A Tropical Horror held up to my memories of them being both chilling and nightmarish. Also holding up was the tense and terrifying tale The Mystery of the Derelict, another story I remembered from that Masters of Terror anthology.

The titular yarn of this anthology, The Ghost Pirates, got me wondering if John Carpenter had read some William Hope Hodgson, back in the day. There is some imagery in this bizarre tale that may or may not have helped shaped the look and feel of the attack on the Sea Grass. Just a thought.

As for what followed The Ghost Pirates

The Sea Horses showed that Hodgson could pluck, or yank, at a reader’s heartstrings every bit as adeptly as he could chill their nerves.

The Searcher of the End House let me know I really have to stop putting off reading Hodgson’s Thomas Carnacki stories. The Stone Ship is yet another cautionary tale warning that derelict vessels adrift at sea are best left alone.

We Two and Bully Dunkan is a wonderful tale of revenge, best described as a kind of collaboration between Jack London and Edgar Allan Poe that I never knew I really needed to read.

Two other stories are worth noting: The Shamraken Homeward-Bounder, which offers a melancholic twist on the legend of the Flying Dutchman, and the tense monster yarn Demons of the Sea.

Fans of weird fiction and tales of high seas mystery and adventure should find plenty to enjoy in The Ghost Pirates and Others.

Book Review: The Wild Bunch: Sam Peckinpah, a Revolution in Hollywood, and the Making of a Legendary Film by W. K. Stratton

The year: 1963. The place: Mexico. The project: a Yul Brynner picture titled Kings of the Sun. This is where stuntman Roy N. Sickner first shared an idea he had for a movie. It would be about a group of outlaws that rob a train, only to get chased into Mexico, become trapped between the posse hunting them and the Mexican authorities, which causes a massive shoot out. Sickner had even come up with a title for his would be movie: The Wild Bunch.

The Wild Bunch

I only have the vaguest of memories of when I first saw The Wild Bunch. This is due to my being, at least at that particular time, no big admirer of the Western genre. I preferred car chases, places with indoor plumbing and electricity, and looking at people that seemed to bathe with some degree of regularity. The Wild Bunch did not fit that bill, at all.

My dad, bless his cineaste heart, tried to get me interested in this “really bloody and violent” western, but I would have none of it.

The only thing I do remember about this viewing is of my dad saying, “Look at those guys, they’re just itching to kill.” An observation made when the camera zoomed in for a close up on the delirious and deranged faces of both Coffer (Strother Martin) and T. C. (L. Q. Jones) just before the opening gunfight erupts and unleashes a storm of bullets upon an unsuspecting town near the Texas-Mexico border.

I got a more formal introduction to The Wild Bunch a few years later, when I read John McCarty’s seminal book Splatter Movies: Breaking the Last Taboo of the Screen. Which had an entire chapter devoted to both a detailed analysis of the film, as well an overview of the career of its iconoclastic, and deeply troubled, co-writer and director, Sam Peckinpah.

Prior to cracking open W. K. Stratton’s The Wild Bunch: Sam Peckinpah, a Revolution in Hollywood, and the Making of a Legendary Film, that chapter in Splatter Movies was where most of my knowledge and understanding of The Wild Bunch came from. I had so much more to learn. So very much.

What I appreciated most about Stratton’s encyclopedic breakdown of how, where, and why every single nut and bolt that came together to create The Wild Bunch was just how forward thinking Peckinpah and company were in terms of representation.

Decades before all this Culture War nonsense broke out over woke this or diversity that, Sam Peckinpah strived for an authentic and realistic portrayal of the Mexican people and culture during the horrors of their revolution. While there are some missteps and antiquated biases on display, it seems that The Wild Bunch managed to get a lot more right than it got wrong.

Stratton’s book gave me a better, bigger, and deeper appreciation of the many complex layers the make up The Wild Bunch. Now it’s time to dust off my blu-ray and give the movie another long overdue viewing…

Book Review: On Location In Blairstown The Making of Friday the 13th by David Grove

The making of Friday the 13th, recounted by those that made it.

On Location in Blairstown

Having read both Peter M. Bracke’s exhaustive (and exhausting) Crystal Lake Memories: The Complete History of Friday the 13th and David Grove’s own Making Friday the 13th: The Legend of Camp Blood, I wondered if there were any tidbits of information remaining to be shared about the creation, production, and release of the very first Friday the 13th movie. The one where Jason was not the killer.

Turns out there were quite a few tidbits still hidden underneath the last few unturned stones littering the torturous path that Sean Cunningham trod to make Friday the 13th into a reality.

The most interesting, to me, was just how labor intensive and technically complicated it was for photographer Richard Illy to create the Friday the 13th logo bursting through a pane glass image for an advertisement Cunningham wanted to place in Variety. There were no digital photoshop tools available in 1979. The logo had to be handmade, the glass was real, and so on and so forth…

Grove’s narrative is unvarnished and unapologetic. He makes no excuses or defenses for the hows and the whats and the whys of Friday the 13th. This was a project born from the desperation of Sean Cunningham’s last grasp at becoming a professional filmmaker, not a failed one.

Even knowing that Friday the 13th would succeed far beyond the craziest expectations of those working on it, many of which thought it would not even be finished, there were times in the book where I felt like I was reading a deep dive into the chaos of a planned movie that never made it through production.

But make it, it did. Big time.

Whether or not the world is a better place because Sean Cunningham managed to get Friday the 13th made is a subject for holier-than-thou stick-in-the-mud types like Gene Siskel, not horror geek fanboys like myself. I know Friday the 13th makes the world a better place, thank you very much.

Book Review: Dark Carnivals Modern Horror and the Origins of American Empire by W. Scott Poole

The late Gene Siskel described his job as film critic as covering “the national dream beat.” He believed that movies contained “the coalesced vapors of the consciousness of a society.”

That belief is the core thesis of W. Scott Poole’s Dark Carnivals Modern Horror and the Origins of American Empire, a supposed examination of how American Horror Cinema can either reflect or critique the innumerable imperial abuses of the United States. I use the descriptive “supposed” because Dark Carnivals is more historical text than it is media study or film criticism.

While I do agree with Poole’s thesis, I wish he had dug a tad deeper into American Horror Cinema’s offerings than just Jaws (1975) and The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (1974).

Jaws, of course, is used as the template example for a conservative reflection of the fears of empire. What with its square-jawed everyman hero saving a quaint small town, a haven for simple, pure Americana, from a marauding monster of a giant, man-eating shark.

The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, on the other (and severed) hand, serves as an example for a somewhat progressive-leaning critique of how the imperial economic policies and practices of the United States can and does chew people up and spit them out, without mercy or feeling.

Other films are referenced or mentioned, of course. A few examples being Get Out, The Mask of Fu Manchu, Independence Day, White Zombie, Scream, and The Last House on the Left. Those are the ones I can remember off the top of my head. I also noticed the absence of a substantive discussion of The Exorcist seeming to be rather conspicuous.

Yet, as I said at the start, these are all just used as illustrative examples of cinema reflecting the fears and/or consequences of imperial power, rather than a deep dive into the texts of the films themselves and how they embodied those fears and consequences.

As a history text I do feel that Dark Carnivals is worthwhile reading and recommend it. But as a media studies text, I thought it fell short of the mark. So it goes.

Newspaper Ad: The 7th Voyage of Sinbad (1958)

San Francisco Examiner – June 11, 1975

Wow. I have zero memory of there having been a theatrical re-release of The 7th Voyage of Sinbad in June of 1975.

Then again I was all of seven years old when this re-release opened and we were living in Alameda, not San Francisco. So there would be no way for me to get to the Coliseum Theatre, located on 9th and Clement, and see that double bill of The 7th Voyage on Sinbad and… Dark Star.

Yes, Dark Star. That ultra-low budget student project turned feature movie made by John Carpenter and Dan O’ Bannon long before they became genre movie icons.

Not that I would have understood or appreciated it at the time. Because I would not know who Dan O’ Bannon or John Carpenter were until 1979.

But I love that this double-bill happened and that somebody, somewhere, actually saw it.

Newspaper Ad(s): Dracula (1931)

San Francisco Examiner – March 21, 1931

Rather than continue to waste valuable time scouring Pinterest, Twitter, and Instagram for other people’s uploads of newspaper ads and listings for horror, science fiction, and fantasy movies, I decided to start getting my own.

And what better place to start than at the very beginning? Here is what appears to be the very first teaser ad for the San Francisco Bay Area release of Universal’s Dracula. The movie considered to have started it all. Without the financial and artistic success of Dracula, there would have been no Frankenstein. No Universal Monsters.

Because what Dracula helped to prove was that a horror movie with an actual supernatural element, one that did not offer a rational explanation for all of the film’s strange and otherworldly events, could and would make a lot of money.

Ladies and gentlemen, the monsters had begun to arrive…

Oakland Tribune – March 28, 1931

Some Blather & Pontification: Invasion of the Intelligence Snatchers

On Christmas Eve 2023 we hosted a dinner and Secret Santa gift exchange game for twenty-five or so of our relatives and friends. Among that number is someone I have known since 1986, or thereabout. We met and became friends while working at the (sadly now defunct) Empire Cinema in San Francisco.

At one point during the chaos and cacophony of small talk, cross talk, and mealtime talk, my friend and I were able to sit and chat about our favorite subject: movies. During our talk my friend made an offhand comment that “in a few years all movies will be made by A.I.”

I did not know if he was serious, but I shared my opinion that could not and would not happen. Ever. We moved onto another movie related subject, or were interrupted by someone, or perhaps ate dinner. No idea. It was a busy evening…

But his comment kept rattling and rolling around in my head, eventually knocking against an unsettling observation made by Miles Bennell, protagonist and narrator of Jack Finney’s 1955 novel Invasion of the Body Snatchers, which I read way back in 1981 or 82.

Bennell notices that the people who have been assimilated by the pods lack creative energy. Because they are not human, only copies of humans. While they have the memories of the people they have copied, they do not have the passion for their interests, hobbies, or work.

The somber and chilling 1978 film version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers, my personal favorite variation of the Body Snatchers story, dramatizes this observation with blood-curdling clarity. At the start of the film we see just enough of the human version of Geoffrey (Art Hindle) to understand the man’s love of basketball is causing him to emotionally and intellectually neglect his romantic partner, Elizabeth (Brooke Adams).

After Geoffrey is assimilated, he no longer has any passion or interest in basketball. He gives away tickets for a game he did not want to miss and, in an unsettling moment that calls back something from the start of the film, we see Geoffrey sitting in front of the television, headphones on, staring at a test pattern.

The film’s gooseflesh inducing ending follows a blank-faced Matthew (Donald Sutherland) going through the motions of working, while also observing the assimilated people that surround him. One image in particular, wherein Matthew looks in on the assimilated woman he, once upon a time, was falling in love with, and sees everybody just standing or sitting, staring off into space.

They are all at their workplace, but they are not really working. They are just… existing within the space the humans they have duplicated occupied prior to assimilation.

Image: IMDB

It is that image in particular that brings me back around to why I think A. I. “creations” will never, ever replace human art. Because they are a flat imitation, a copy, of something that cannot be imitated or copied: the human mind.

Because whatever it is that makes an individual who and what they are is, at this time, intangible.

As much fun as it is to think that A. I. can make the infinite monkey theorem empirically verifiable, I doubt that supposed verification would ever create something original or unique. That would take a human mind. A human soul. A human drive.

The only thing that A. I. can do is mix and match pre-existing elements and concepts into more pre-existing elements and concepts. It cannot, and will never, think outside the box. Take a chance or a risk.

Because of this A. I. art exists in an area of the uncanny valley that is equal parts hilarious and unnerving. It is has all the elements of a human creation, but none of the actual humanity.

I would expect nothing else from the “great tech minds” behind the snake oil that are NFTs and cryptocurrency.